The Blue Flower Penelope Fitzgerald

I like the description of time and place, the sarcastic family in the dissolute castle, the laundry and the bad medicine. If I knew anything about Novalis the revelation of the poets identity at the end of the book might have given me more wry knowing grin points, but it didn't really matter. The image of the blue flower, sad, unattainable, perfect love, is complete and beautiful. The dialogue - from an age when things were more likely to be left unsaid - is just the sort of finely balanced and nuanced thing I love. I should start getting the evidence out of the book for these reviews - I'm gonna quote - one tiny scene chosen pretty much at random, prisoners are begging for money and the mother throws down her purse. Three brothers discuss it:
."They will cut each others' throats for it" said Karl.
"No. I am sure they have a system of distribution," saids Erasmus.
"Very probably the youngest will get least" said the Bernard.
A subtle delight. Likewise the description of the characters internal worlds - "Doctor Ebhard, perhaps relieved to have something definite to say had forbidden dancing absolutely" and the authorial asides - his real motive was one of the strongest known to humanity, the need to torment himself.
I'm going to read The Offshore next - Fitzgerald on the Thames. Sounds brilliant. Well I might read something else first, but this is an acute, sympathetic writer, whose warmth made me feel good.

Champagne by Chekov (short story)

Champagne Chekov

This is a devastating Chekov short story. It's about a man working as a signalman in the middle of the Russian steppes. He isn't happy. Chekov describes his wife looking at him with the love that comes from her having no opportunity and no income. i.e. desperation. It is pretty brutal. He is visited by a vibrant sexy widower and gets drunk. This isn't a chance for redemption, only a way of allowing the man to carry his previous fuck ups into a different, not better future. The story fits in tidily the history and environment around this man, perhaps it's only source of comfort is the perfection of the writing craft itself. Even in passing the description of a slightly thick person enjoying the feeling of being miserable as he trudges down the railway line, as it gives him a weight he can't otherwise access... it's so precise it is perfect. Anyway, I love Chekov. I don't really like the look of this Ford chooses Chekov anthology, and Ford's introduction struck me when I read it as being something like " I don't know much about Chekov but I'm such a great Chekovian writer myself I've picked this lot." Arrogant pish. But who cares about the packaging really, this story shines out. x

So 1Q84. When I saw someone else reading this in a café in the South Bank somewhere, I had to fight the urge to go up and talk to them about it. I felt liked I'd seen a fellow traveller in a strange city and I wanted to know if they were enjoying it, if they were getting it, what they liked and hated. I did like it, because at times it built this world with two moons and religion and the Tokyo freeways into something very solid, then at other times it seemed to be driven by the intellect of murakami, and so I felt distanced from it. One occasion when the book did me feel a bit silly was when 500 pages or so in I realised it's Books 1 and 2 of a trilogy. so I've still not finished with these two worlds. Anyway, I'll come back to this when I read part 3. It's time better spent than reading about football I guess.

So far, it's the story of two people, Aomame and Tengo, and their movement back towards each other.  The chapters alternate between the two lovers, who come to be moving in parallel but connected worlds - 1984 and 1Q84. It seems a book that allows Murakami to revisit a lot of the things that he is interested in - physical endurance, cults, and the world changing power of love. Because it writes about writing and fiction I think Murakami himself is very present in the book, and whether the interesting things he has to say justifies the egotism in this approach is a bit of a moot point. In places the writing is strangely clichéd, and I found the lesbian sex and violence both a bit kind of... unrealised, or corny. Yet at times it was brilliant. so here I sit - torn. I don't recommend it, but I want to talk to people that have read it, because the frustrations and delights I met on the way gave me something I haven't experienced before.

A way of remembering the books I would otherwise forget.

This is pretty much the first thing I've contributed to the internet. It's going to be based on my reviews of the books I read, and other bits of cultural inspiration. On holiday I thought the title should be The Library of My Mind. That now sounds very pompous. But maybe pompous is better than cool. The internet is rife with cool. I gonna just start.